1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 8 Wis.2d
  5. 8 Wis.2d 288 (1959)
 

RUID v. DAVIS

8 Wis.2d 288 (1959)

RUID, Appellant, v. DAVIS, Respondent. DAVIS, Respondent, v. JONES, Administrator, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 3, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Douglas, Omernik & Bitney of Spooner, and oral argument by E. E. Omernik.

For the respondent there was a brief by Terence N. Hickey of Hayward, and Doar & Knowles of New Richmond, and oral argument by Mr. John Doar and Mr. Hickey.

HALLOWS, J.

The first question is whether Davis was causally negligent as to speed as a matter of law. To pass on this question it is necessary to review the material evidence on how the accident happened from the standpoint most favorable to Davis, because he was absolved of any negligence by the jury. Zang v. Schumann (1952), 262 Wis. 570, 55 N.W.2d 864; Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp. (1957), 1 Wis.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases