Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Hamrick & Hamrick, Rutherfordton, for plaintiffs, appellants.
Harkins, Van Winkle, Walton & Buck, Asheville, and Hamrick & Jones, Rutherfordton, for defendant, appellee.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
"The overwhelming weight of authority in this country is to the effect that ponds, pools, lakes, streams, reservoirs, and other bodies of water, do not per se constitute attractive nuisances. 56 Am.Jur., Waters, section 436, page 850. `The attractive nuisance doctrine generally is not applicable to bodies of water, artificial as well as natural, in the absence of some unusual condition or artificial feature other than the mere water and its...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.