SHOOPAK v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO.


17 Misc.2d 201 (1959)

Neal Shoopak, Plaintiff, v. United States Rubber Company et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County.

January 12, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur, Dry & Dole for United States Rubber Company, defendant.

Turkewitz & Tessel for plaintiff.


JAMES W. BAILEY, J.

Defendant United States Rubber Company makes this motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action of the complaint upon the ground that they do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when a tire allegedly manufactured by the moving defendant exploded while he was inflating and attempting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases