TATA v. MUSKOVITZ

Docket No. 50, Calendar No. 47,576.

354 Mich. 695 (1959)

94 N.W.2d 71

TATA v. MUSKOVITZ.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided January 12, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charfoos, Gussin, Weinstein & Kroll (Samuel Charfoos, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Harry F. Briggs (Richard C. Rogers, of counsel), for defendants.


BLACK, J.

OPINION

The defendant employer and the defendant insurer review an award to plaintiff under the workmen's compensation law. The reviewable question is stated and counterstated by the respective contenders as follows:

By the defendant-appellants:

"Is one engaged for a single special purpose, for a definite price, who provides his own help, mechanical apparatus, and is held responsible only for the end result, a contractor?"

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases