In paragraph "14" of his original petition before the Special Term, he alleges that the conviction is void because "(1) the information does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime, and (2) the magistrate did not inform your petitioner on arraignment as required by Section 335-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure." On the appeal to this court and at the time of the oral argument, the sufficiency of the information was the sole contention. We do not pass on the question...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
