SCHNASE v. PAUL GOTTSCHALK, INC.


15 Misc.2d 77 (1958)

Annemarie Schnase, Respondent, v. Paul Gottschalk, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

October 2, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horst Kurnik for appellant.

Adolf Hamburger and Fritz Weinschenk for respondent.

STEUER and AURELIO, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; HOFSTADTER, J., dissents and votes to affirm in opinion.


Per Curiam.

In plaintiff's account there was an item for bookbinding. Admittedly this work was performed and plaintiff paid for it in East Germany. Yet the rate of exchange charged and for which plaintiff has had judgment was for the West German mark. No credible explanation was given for this discrepancy. The difference in exchange amounted to $513.71. Plaintiff's verdict should therefore have been $1,143.27, plus appropriate interest, and the judgment should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases