1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 166 F.Supp.
  5. 166 F.Supp. 549 (1958)
 

JOY MUSIC, INC. v. SEECO RECORDS

166 F.Supp. 549 (1958)

JOY MUSIC, INC., Hawthorne Music Corporation, Edward B. Marks Music Corporation, Edwin H. Morris & Company, Inc., Crestview Music Corp., Mayfair Music Corp., Paramount Music Corporation, Famous Music Corporation and Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. SEECO RECORDS, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 21, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abeles & Bernstein, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Cohen & Sandomire, New York City, for defendant.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Parties remain free to substitute private licensing agreements for the protections afforded them by section 1(e) of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.A. § 1(e).1 Whether they have indeed done so is the question presented here. The parties have departed from the exact terms of the statute by varying the accounting period, lowering the royalties for several songs and dispensing with notice requirements. These mutually convenient variations, however, are not sufficient to support the contention that theirs was a private licensing agreement enforceable in state courts only. The letters relied upon by the defendant seem to indicate rather that the parties intended their relationship to be governed by the compulsory license provisions of section 1(e).2 Absent a clear showing to the contrary, it will not be presumed that this departure from the exact terms of the statute was intended as a waiver of its protection.

Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss is denied and the plaintiffs' motion to strike is granted. Settle order on notice.

FootNotes


1. Edward B. Marks Music Corp. v. Foullon, 2 Cir., 1949, 171 F.2d 905.
2. This Court reached a similar result with letters identical in form in Leo Feist, Inc., v. Derby Records, Inc., D.C.S.D. N.Y., Civ. No. 95-227, April 22, 1955. See also Leo Feist, Inc., v. American Music Roll Co., 3 Cir., 1918, 251 F. 245.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases