GENOVAY v. FOX


50 N.J. Super. 538 (1958)

143 A.2d 229

ANTHONY GENOVAY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES FOX, TRADING AS WHITE HORSE BOWLING ACADEMY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 16, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George Pellettieri argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Pellettieri and Rabstein and Mr. Lewis C. Stanley, attorneys).

Mr. Richard J.S. Barlow, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lenox, Giordano and Lenox, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

The principal questions posed for resolution on this appeal are these. To what extent does the proprietor of a combination bowling alley-bar owe his business invitees the duty of securing the premises against the hazard of entry by an armed bandit and consequent injury at the hands of the intruder in the course of a holdup of the proprietor? After such an entry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases