1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 26 N.J.
  5. 26 N.J. 517 (1958)
 

ROBSON v. RODRIQUEZ

26 N.J. 517 (1958)

141 A.2d 1

WILFRED ROBSON, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF MARY E. ROBSON, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. VICTOR RODRIQUEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 28, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).

Mr. Robert W. Criscuolo argued the cause for the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Messrs. Parker, McCay and Criscuolo, attorneys).

Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., argued the cause for the intervenor (Mr. Harold Kolovsky, Acting Attorney-General).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

The primary question raised by this appeal is the constitutional validity of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(d) of the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, L. 1952, c. 174 (N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq.) which precludes a person who sustains personal injury or property damage caused by a financially irresponsible motorist from receiving payment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases