KOBLITZ v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY


164 F.Supp. 367 (1958)

Milton S. KOBLITZ, Plaintiff, v. The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 9, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan B. Kogan, Louis Boehm, New York City, for plaintiff. David M. Palley, New York City, of counsel.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for defendant. Ralph L. McAfee, George M. Billings, John D. Calhoun, New York City, of counsel.


FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

Defendant moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., on the grounds, first, that judgment in a prior action in this court is res judicata as to the cause of action alleged in the complaint, and second, that the cause of action is barred by the applicable New York statutes of limitation.

This action, commenced on February 15, 1957 in the New York Supreme Court, was removed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases