QUINN v. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO.


50 N.J. Super. 468 (1958)

142 A.2d 655

HAROLD QUINN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY, RESPONDENT, AND LONDON & LANCASHIRE INDEMNITY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, AND FIREMAN'S FUND INDEMNITY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 13, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Francis H. Pykon argued the cause for appellant Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company (Mr. Henry M. Grosman, attorney).

Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for appellant London & Lancashire Indemnity Company (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys).

Mr. John W. O'Brien argued the cause for cross-appellant Travelers Insurance Company (Messrs. O'Brien, Brett & O'Brien, attorneys).

Mr. William J. Straub argued the cause for respondent Harold Quinn (Mr. Joseph P. Dunn, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company (Fireman's) and London & Lancashire Indemnity Company (London & Lancashire) appeal from a County Court judgment sustaining an award by the Workmen's Compensation Division in petitioner's favor, but modifying the allocation of liability for the award and for the cost of surgical intervention to correct the condition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases