CITY OF MADISON v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. R. CO.


2 Wis.2d 467 (1958)

CITY OF MADISON, Respondent, vs. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 7, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Aberg, Bell, Blake & Conrad of Madison, and Bender, Trump, McIntyre, Trimborn & Godfrey of Milwaukee, and oral argument by William J. P. Aberg and Edwin Conrad.

For the respondent there was a brief by Alton S. Heassler, assistant city attorney, and Harold E. Hanson, city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Heassler.


MARTIN, C. J.

It is respondent's position that in the absence of a bill of exceptions the questions before this court are whether the findings support the judgments and whether the ordinance is unconstitutional on its face.

No bill of exceptions has been settled. Appellant has submitted no appendix. The stipulations of fact filed in superior court are printed in appellant's brief, together with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in all three cases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases