1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 5 Wis.2d
  5. 5 Wis.2d 401 (1958)
 

MATAYO v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

5 Wis.2d 401 (1958)

MATAYO, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 5, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Edward T. O'Neill of Fond du Lac.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

FAIRCHILD, J.

The parties agree that "if the employer be under obligation to transport an employee to and from work, the employee is entitled to compensation if injured while being so transported." Githens v. Industrial Comm. (1936), 220 Wis. 658, 662, 265 N. W. 662. The Industrial Commission contends that it was entitled to draw the inference that there was no contract whereby Ohlson was obliged to transport Matayo back to Rhinelander. It is true that there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases