DRIER v. RANDFORCE AMUSEMENT CORP.


14 Misc.2d 362 (1958)

Sam Drier, Plaintiff, v. Randforce Amusement Corp. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County.

October 8, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles G. Tierney (Harry Schechter and Raymond C. Green of counsel), for Randforce Amusement Corp., defendant.

Jack Schifter and Alfred S. Julien for plaintiff.


MATTHEW M. LEVY, J.

The defendant Randforce Amusement Corp. has moved, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, on the ground that its second affirmative defense — a plea of res judicata — is sufficient as a matter of law, the defense being founded on proof by documents and official records.

The papers before me are voluminous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases