HADJENIAN v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.


4 Wis.2d 298 (1958)

HADJENIAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent: KELLY-MOHRHUSEN COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 3, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and John R. Henderson of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Henderson.

For the respondent Shnorhig Hadjenian there was a brief by Meldman & Kahn, attorneys, and Edward H. Meldman and Clifford K. Meldman of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Edward H. Meldman.

For the respondent Sears, Roebuck & Company the cause was submitted on the brief of Arnold, Philipp & Murray of Milwaukee.


BROADFOOT, J.

After all of the testimony had been presented Kelly moved for a directed verdict. In support of its contention that the motion should have been granted, Kelly claims there is no credible evidence to support a jury finding that Bartlein or Barbasiewicz plugged the openings in the coal water heater. Both employees testified that they did not insert the plugs. No witness testified he or she saw anyone insert the plugs. Therefore, Kelly contends, the positive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases