PROCTOR ELECTRIC CO. v. ZINK

[No. 208, September Term, 1957.]

217 Md. 22 (1958)

141 A.2d 721

PROCTOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, ETC. v. ZINK, ETC., ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 20, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Andrew, with whom were Rollins, Smalkin, Weston & Andrew on the brief, for the appellant.

Milton I. Vogelhut for Alan R. Zink.

Edward L. Putzel, with whom was August Levene on the brief, for Gilbert Cummins & Co., Inc.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.


PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Proctor Electric Company (Proctor), the plaintiff below, has appealed from a judgment for the appellees, Alan R. Zink, trading as Western Welding Company (Zink), and Gilbert Cummins & Company, Inc. (Cummins), for costs, entered by direction of the trial court at the conclusion of the plaintiff's case.

When reviewing the correctness of the direction of a verdict in favor of the defendants, we must resolve...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases