1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 5 Wis.2d
  5. 5 Wis.2d 124 (1958)
 

HUCK v. CHICAGO, ST. P., M. & O. R. CO.

5 Wis.2d 124 (1958)

HUCK, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent: DOUGHBOY INDUSTRIES, INC., Interpleaded Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 7, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Stafford, Pfiffner & Stafford of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by Robert F. Pfiffner.

For the respondent there was a brief by Wilcox & Sullivan of Eau Claire, attorneys, and Warren Newcome of St. Paul, Minnesota, of counsel, and oral argument by Francis J. Wilcox.

WINGERT, J.

Summary judgment was properly denied.

The present phase of this litigation turns on the construction of the following provision of the contract between Doughboy (the "Industry") and the Omaha Railway:

"11. The Industry also agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Railway Company for loss, damage, or injury from any act or omission of the Industry, its employees, or agents, to the person or property of the parties hereto and their employees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases