BOROS v. MAYO


8 Misc.2d 949 (1957)

Edwin Boros, Respondent-Appellant, v. Albert I. Mayo et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 31, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin Adler for appellants-respondents.

Joseph R. D'Arrigo for respondent-appellant.

HECHT, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The imposition of the condition for the opening of the default which deprived defendants of a trial by jury was an abuse of discretion (Glueck v. Tull, 192 App. Div. 81; Zeesell Realty v. Cunningham, 125 Misc. 444). The defendants in these circumstances did not absolutely waive the right to an examination before trial.

The order should be modified by striking therefrom the provision imposing conditions, and as modified affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases