Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
On appellant's return as a parole violator he was subject to the jurisdiction of the Board of Parole until the expiration of the sum of the maximum of the two sentences (Penal Law, § 2190, subd. 3; cf. People ex rel. La Pore v. Martin, 263 App. Div. 764; People ex rel. Seymour v. Branham, 255 App...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.