TANDOC v. LUCKENBACH S. S. CO.


8 Misc.2d 893 (1957)

Rufino Tandoc et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent. William O. Dyer et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent. Vincente Aguirre et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 10, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Gyory for appellants.

Francis I. Fallon for respondent.

HOFSTADTER, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The finding of the court below that the causes of action arose in California at the time of the discharge of the plaintiffs when they left the vessel and applying the four-year California Statute of Limitations, pursuant to section 13 of the Civil Practice Act, was error. The combination of circumstances giving rise to the right to sue and where the crucial combination of events transpired or where they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases