1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 274 Wis.
  5. 274 Wis. 558 (1957)
 

PERLICK v. COUNTRY MUT. CASUALTY CO.

274 Wis. 558 (1957)

PERLICK, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. COUNTRY MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. INTEGRITY MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. CARPENTER, Defendant and Respondent: COUNTRY MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Godfrey, Godfrey & Warren of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Thomas G. Godfrey.

For the respondents there was a brief by Burlingame, Gibbs & Roper of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Richard S. Gibbs and by Roy E. Berg of Janesville.

WINGERT, J.

The facts are undisputed. It is conceded that the "no action" and "household exclusion" provisions of the insurance policy issued by Country Mutual to Carpenter in Illinois were valid under the laws of that state, and if available to the company in the present actions arising out of the accident in Wisconsin, would require that the pleas in abatement and in bar be sustained. Hence the only question on these appeals is whether the "no action" clause, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases