AYRES, Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Statute (LSA-R.S. 23:1021 et seq.) and, in the alternative, as a tort claim for damages predicated upon negligence. Defendant filed an exception of no cause of action, which, on trial, was sustained by the trial court as to plaintiff's principal demand asserted for workmen's compensation and, accordingly, her suit as to said demand was dismissed. From the judgment thus...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.