HILL v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY

No. 86-57.

149 F.Supp. 470 (1957)

Sirry D. HILL, Libelant, v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY, a corporation, Doe I, Doe II and Doe III, Respondents.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

March 14, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margolis, McTernan & Branton and John W. Porter, Los Angeles, Cal., for libelant.

Lillick, Geary, McHose, Roethke & Myers and Lawrence D. Bradley, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent United Fruit Co.


MATHES, District Judge.

This cause having come before the Court for hearing upon the order to show cause why the case should not be remanded to the State Court and the motion of libelant, subsequently filed, to dismiss the action "as against the fictitiously named defendants [respondents], Doe I, Doe II and Doe III", and to transfer the case "to the law docket of this Court as an action at law"; and the matters having been heard and submitted for decision; and it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases