PARDO v. PARDO


98 So.2d 489 (1957)

Albert PARDO, Appellant, v. Frieda PARDO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

On Rehearing November 27, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Pardo, Miami, for appellant.

Nelan Sweet, Miami Beach, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

On Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

We have reconsidered the per curiam order of affirmance in the above cause and are now of the view that the final decree of divorce dated the 10th day of February, 1956 and the order adjudging defendant in contempt dated the 26th day of March, 1956 should be and they are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases