IN RE APPLICATION OF FREYGANG


25 N.J. 357 (1957)

136 A.2d 625

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF WALTER H. FREYGANG, ET ALS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 9, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Weltchek argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Weltchek & Weltchek, attorneys; Mr. Ernest Prupis on the brief).

Mr. David C. Thompson argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General, attorney).

Messrs. Milmed & Rosen, Mr. Samuel L. Hirschberg, Mr. Robert F. McAlevy, Jr., Mr. Ezra L. Nolan and Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder filed a brief amici curiae on behalf of various municipalities.


PER CURIAM

These proceedings raised the sole question whether the statute was duly passed by the Legislature or otherwise made effective by law in the manner required by the Constitution. The essential premise of the appellants' attack is that the act was a special law within Art. IV, Sec. VII, par. 10 of the Constitution. We agree with the Appellate Division that the nomenclature adopted by the Legislature is not conclusive or decisive, and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases