BELL v. DUESING


275 Wis. 47 (1957)

BELL, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents, vs. DUESING and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Dougherty, Arnold & Philipp of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold.

For the respondents there was a brief by Murphy, Shapiro & Gorsky of Milwaukee, and oral argument by I. B. Shapiro.


BROADFOOT, J.

It is the first claim of the defendants that the jury did not make a proper apportionment of the negligence. They contend that the negligence of the minor plaintiff was at least as great as that of the defendant as a matter of law and that the complaint should therefore be dismissed. In the alternative they contend that this court should grant a new trial because of the improper apportionment of negligence.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases