Per Curiam.
Three charges of misconduct were made against the respondent. The Referee appointed by this court sustained one of them. The charge that was sustained involved the retention of a sum of money by the respondent which he claimed was paid as a fee, but which his client claimed was given to him for the purpose of deposit in court as a tender in a pending action. The money was refunded to the client prior to the commencement of these proceedings. On...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
