SMEE v. CHECKER CAB CO.


1 Wis.2d 202 (1957)

SMEE, Respondent, vs. CHECKER CAB COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 4, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and A. W. Kivett of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by A. W. Kivett.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Horace P. O'Hara and Merle W. Hillis, both of Milwaukee.


WINGERT, J.

Appellant contends that the jury's damage appraisals are excessive, unsupported by credible evidence, and based on conjecture and speculation. We agree that such is the case with respect to the figures for medical and hospital expense and loss of wages, but consider that the award for pain and suffering may be sustained.

Pain and suffering—$2,500. Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases