ALPERT v. HEIN


8 Misc.2d 1010 (1957)

William I. Alpert et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Alpert Bros., Plaintiffs, v. Sidney S. Hein et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

September 4, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shea, Greenman, Gardner & McConnaughey, and Greenman, Shea & Zimet for plaintiffs.

Milton Pinkus for Murray Rosen and another, defendants.

Hein, Bradie & Waters for Sidney S. Hein and another, defendants.


J. VINCENT KEOGH, J.

Defendants Hein and Adams have moved to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for an order requiring plaintiffs to file an amended complaint complying with the provisions of section 241 of the Civil Practice Act and with rules 90 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Defendants Rosen and Harris have similarly moved, except that instead of asking for dismissal of the complaint they seek an order striking certain specified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases