Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from, in addition to restraining defendants from the use of the name "Sinram" in its fuel oil business and directing an accounting, enjoins them from attempting to secure any of plaintiff's employees to breach their contracts of employment with plaintiff and also restrains defendants "from carrying on any acts, scheme or plan attempting to destroy plaintiff's business". We think the latter two restraining provisions should...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.