Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered.
Under the circumstances in this case, it was prejudicial error to admit in evidence, over appellant's objection, the testimony of the person who stole the property to the effect that he had been indicted and had pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor under an indictment charging him with the larceny of certain property including that which appellant allegedly
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.