Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.
No opinion.
Rabin and Valente, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum:
The provisions of the indenture agreement on the subject of jurisdiction are sufficiently ambiguous to warrant the application of the principle of strict construction against the maker, in this instance the defendant-respondent. In our view of this case, the defendant-respondent validly consented...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
