RUDD v. ROGERSON

No. 17650.

297 P.2d 533 (1956)

Lloyd K. RUDD, Plaintiff In Error, v. Robert B. ROGERSON, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 21, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Doyle, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Albert P. Fischer, Fort Collins, Forrest S. Blunk, Denver, for defendant in error.


MOORE, Justice.

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the trial court and hereinafter called plaintiff or Rudd, seeks review by writ of error of the judgment entered by the district court dismissing his complaint for insufficiency of evidence to support the same. He also seeks review of the judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendant Rogerson on Rogerson's counterclaim. Rudd's action is for rescission of a contract between him and defendant Rogerson by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases