BRANDES v. ORAM CONSTR. CORP.


5 Misc.2d 710 (1956)

Max Brandes, Appellant-Respondent, v. Oram Construction Corp., Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 13, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sigmund Goldstein and Max Nachamie for appellant-respondent.

Alfred J. Conforti for respondent-appellant.

HOFSTADTER, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

It was not a breach of the agreement between the parties for plaintiff, due to changes for the worse in his financial circumstances and sickness requiring an operation, to notify the lending institution that his income would be less than stated in the application and not sufficient for him to carry the "G. I. loan" he had applied for in connection with a contract for the purchase of a house from defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases