Appellant contends that he was not adequately represented by trial counsel, in that, without appellant's knowledge, his trial counsel also represented a prosecution witness who, with another prosecution witness, had been indicted for crimes, committed with the aid of the deceased, but not connected with the crime for which appellant was being tried, and that as a result of conflicting interests and divided loyalties there was no proper and effective cross-examination of such...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
