ZWARENSTEYN v. ZWARENSTEYN

Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 46,921.

347 Mich. 353 (1956)

79 N.W.2d 913

ZWARENSTEYN v. ZWARENSTEYN.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 28, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rom & Newton Dilley, for plaintiff.

Jerrold H. Keyworth, for defendant.


KELLY, J.

Defendant appeals from a decree of separate maintenance because the decree was granted after defendant's attorney stated in court that it was not necessary to introduce testimony to sustain plaintiff's allegations in her bill of complaint and, because of said statement, no testimony was offered which would sustain such decree.

Plaintiff was the first witness called to the stand, and she testified that she married the defendant in the Netherlands...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases