DEUTSCH v. LONG IS. CARPET CLEANING CO.


5 Misc.2d 684 (1956)

Joseph B. Deutsch, Appellant, v. Long Island Carpet Cleaning Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

November 15, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia Hatry for appellant.

Benjamin Geller for respondent.

EDER and TILZER, JJ., concur; HECHT, J., dissents in memorandum.


Per Curiam.

The arbitration clause included among the conditions set forth on the reversed side of the receipt given by this carpet-cleaning company to the customer is lacking in mutuality. While the customer's claims are required to be arbitrated, the company's claim for money due is at its sole option litigable in the courts. Parties may, of course, expressly agree that only certain types of controversies between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases