1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 144 Cal.App.2d
  5. 144 Cal.App.2d 545 (1956)
 

ARTHUR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 21993.

144 Cal.App.2d 545 (1956)

301 P.2d 286

MARIE ARTHUR, Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

September 21, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marie Arthur, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, and Edwin F. Shinn, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem.*

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant city of Los Angeles, from a minute order denying her motion for a new trial, and from a minute order denying her motion to vacate the judgment appealed from. Defendants and respondents have moved to dismiss the appeal from the judgment upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases