The defendant city had placed a coating of blacktop paving material, known as Tarmac, upon a concrete sidewalk running along the side of a building, the first floor of which was occupied by the plaintiff's employer as an office equipment store. Part of the Tarmac coating also extended in front of the building. Where the Tarmac ended and overlapped the concrete sidewalk in front of the employer's store, there was a difference in height, variously described as one quarter of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
