The action was one for work performed and materials furnished, allegedly "at the special instance and request of the defendant's agents, representatives and managing officers". The proof showed that the work had been ordered by one Martin who concededly was not an employee of the defendant but an employee of another corporation known as Bingaman Motor Express Company, Inc. The latter corporation was the tenant in possession of the premises upon which the work was done. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
