Plaintiff-appellant contends that the increased amount is inadequate. It sufficiently appears from the papers that defendant is the sole stockholder of a corporation engaged in the restaurant business and that his income has increased substantially since the judgment of divorce was granted in 1947. There is, however, an extreme divergence between the parties' contentions as to the amount of defendant's income and his resources. As to these, plaintiff's proof is largely hearsay...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.