JOOLS v. SCHATZ HALPUN CATERING CORP.


5 Misc.2d 613 (1956)

Helen Jools Respondent, v. Schatz Halpun Catering Corp., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

October 25, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. S. Bernstein and Bernard Helfenstein for appellant.

Louis George Rudd for respondent.

EDER, HECHT and TILZER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

There is no proof in the record of any negligence on the part of the defendant, nor is there any competent testimony to indicate the cause of the accident. The mere happening of the accident without any proof of the cause thereof does not give rise to a cause of action (Beutenmiller v. West End Tavern, 285 App. Div. 820, affd. 1 N.Y.2d 652). The refusal of the court below to dismiss the complaint at the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases