1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 230 F.2d
  5. 230 F.2d 387 (1956)
 

RAUGHLEY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY

No. 11644.

230 F.2d 387 (1956)

Burton R. RAUGHLEY, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided February 7, 1956.

Rehearing Denied March 6, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Fred DiBona, Philadelphia, Pa. (James F. Masterson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Theodore Voorhees, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

In this case the appellee has moved to dismiss the appellant's appeal, alleging it not to be timely brought. The case takes us to an examination and application of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., having to do with the regulations of timeliness for appeal.

Specifically to present the problem the docket entries are herewith set out:

"Dec. 10, 1954. Opinion, Kirkpatrick, Ch. J. granting judgment in favor of defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases