1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 39 N.J.
  5. 39 N.J. Super. 534 (1956)
 

MAGIEROWSKI v. BUCKLEY

39 N.J. Super. 534 (1956)

121 A.2d 749

FELIX MAGIEROWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DONALD BUCKLEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 23, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ira D. Dorian argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Matthew Grayson, attorney).

Mr. Saul Neivert argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John T. Glennon, attorney; Mr. Saul Tischler, of counsel on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

The question before us is: Can a father maintain an action for the loss of services of his employed adult daughter, and for punitive damages, by reason of her alleged seduction under a promise of marriage, in view of the provisions of N.J.S. 2A:23-1 et seq., commonly known as the "Heart Balm" Act?

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the father of Stephanie Magierowski, unmarried...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases