1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 1 N.Y.2d
  5. 1 N.Y.2d 54 (1956)
 

DULBERG v. MOCK

1 N.Y.2d 54 (1956)

Murray Dulberg, Appellant, v. Hugo Mock et al., Doing Business under the Name of Mock & Blum, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 22, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray Dulberg, in person, and Alexander Dreiband for Murray Dulberg, appellant.

Archer Scherl and Samuel Lawrence Brennglass for respondents.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DYE, FULD and BURKE, JJ., concur with DESMOND, J.; VAN VOORHIS, J., dissents and votes to affirm; FROESSEL, J., taking no part.

DESMOND, J.

We review the dismissal, for alleged insufficiency of content, of all five of the causes of action pleaded in this amended complaint. Plaintiff is a layman acting for himself. Defendants are patent attorneys. The pleading is inartistically drawn and is indefinite in places. However, our inquiry is as to whether it states in some recognizable form any cause of action known to our law. The applicable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases