This is another skirmish in the running battle over freight rates for transportation of carbon black from the Southwestern area to the industrial area in the East. The precise question presented is whether the Interstate Commerce Commission's action in vacating a prior suspension of proposed rail rates was proper and, preliminary to that, whether such Commission act is reviewable at all.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AMARILLO-BORGER EXPRESS v. UNITED STATES
Civ. A. 6289.
138 F.Supp. 411 (1956)
AMARILLO-BORGER EXPRESS, Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES of America.
United States District Court N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 24, 1956.
January 24, 1956.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
William R. McDowell, Dallas, Tex., for intervenor, Southwestern Railroads.
Stanley N. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Heard L. Floore, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., John C. Ford, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., James E. Kilday, Albert Parker, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Earl E. Pollock, Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Robert W. Ginnane, Gen. Counsel, I.C.C., Washington, D. C., Bernard H. English, Atty., I.C.C., Fort Worth, Tex., H. Neil Garson, Attys., Carroll T. Prince, Jr., I.C.C., Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.
Before BROWN, Circuit Judge, and ATWELL and ESTES, District Judges.
United States District Court N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
