AMATO v. LAUDICINA

Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 46,668.

347 Mich. 197 (1956)

79 N.W.2d 469

AMATO v. LAUDICINA.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 6, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carroll & Gallagher (Howard R. Carroll, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Louis J. Colombo (Louis J. Colombo, Jr., of counsel), for defendants.


BLACK, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an agreement for partition of business property owned by tenants in common. The only question is whether, according to apparent tenor of the mentioned agreement, plaintiffs are entitled on their bill to a decree of partition specifying presently identified physical construction as the line of partition. The chancellor held that plaintiffs are not entitled to such relief and entered a decree dismissing their bill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases