1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 20 N.J.
  5. 20 N.J. 499 (1956)
 

MAHONEY v. NITROFORM CO., INC.

20 N.J. 499 (1956)

120 A.2d 454

DOROTHY W. MAHONEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. NITROFORM COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT. HARRIET M. KRAEMER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. NITROFORM COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 30, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alexander Avidan argued the causes for appellants-cross-respondents (Messrs. Avidan & Avidan, attorneys).

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the causes for respondent-cross-appellant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.

The Appellate Division reversed judgments of the Essex County Court sustaining workmen's compensation awards for the dependents of Richard W. Mahoney and Edward C. Kraemer, respectively the president and the secretary-treasurer of Nitroform Company, Inc. Mahoney and Kraemer were killed on February 21, 1953 in an explosion and fire at the company's Newark plant at 444 Frelinghuysen Avenue.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases