SHAPIRO v. SOLOMON


42 N.J. Super. 377 (1956)

126 A.2d 654

MAX SHAPIRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK SOLOMON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 9, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jack Solomon argued the cause for defendant-appellant, pro se.

Mr. Ralph N. Solodar argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

The amount in controversy on this appeal is only $250 but acceptance of the implications of defendant's arguments in support of a reversal, advanced with some color of authority in two recent Supreme Court opinions, would threaten marked retrogression in the application of R.R. 4:8-5(b), permitting the statement of inconsistent and alternative claims in a pleading.

The action was brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases