1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 274 Wis.
  5. 274 Wis. 96 (1956)
 

JOHNSON v. SMITZ

274 Wis. 96 (1956)

JOHNSON and another, Appellants, vs. SMITZ and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 7, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Cavanagh, Mittelstaed, Sheldon, Heide & Hartley of Kenosha, for Plymoth C. Johnson, and by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, for Elizabeth Johnson, and oral argument by Frederick D. Hartley.

For the respondents there was a brief by Hammond & Hammond of Kenosha, and oral argument by Willis R. Hammond.

WINGERT, J.

Two questions are presented on this appeal.

(1) Plaintiffs complain that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence offered by them in rebuttal. We find no error.

A few minutes after the accident, Deputy Sheriff Euting and another officer arrived on the scene and made the customary investigation. A little later Deputy Sheriff Schreck also arrived. At the trial, one Ellingson, a bystander at the place of the accident, testified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases